From the Desk of...
News and Topics of Interest
![]()
| Month: | July 2004 |
| MPO: | Area Plan Commission of Tippecanoe |
| Location: | Lafayette-West Lafayette-Tippecanoe County, IN |
| Topic: | New Kid on the Block |
New Kid on the Block

By Sallie Dell Fahey
When you last heard from
this MPO in the From the Desk of … column, Jim Hawley was reflecting on his
long, productive transportation planning career.
Though not the “new kid on the block” here at Tippecanoe County
(I’ve been with the APC more than 30 years), I certainly hold that distinction
among Indiana MPO Directors. Because
I’m new to this branch of planning it seems logical that my first column
should reflect 6-months’ worth of impressions about transportation planning in
Lafayette – West Lafayette – Tippecanoe County and in Indiana.
1.
The process of transportation planning is pretty much like the process
for all other kinds of planning – establishing goals, collecting data,
analyzing data, developing alternatives, testing alternatives, seeking advice
and opinions from citizens and stakeholders, moving the document through the
official adoption process and implementing the plan.
It’s that similarity of process that makes it familiar and comfortable.
2.
But, familiar and comfortable does not mean uninteresting.
The high tech world of ITS, for example, has a certain “wow” factor
that pushes the interest buttons of both staff and plan commission members.
The high tech world of transportation planning keeps our innovation
juices flowing.
3.
Other transportation planning activities maintain a high touch quality. We stay in tune with citizens by listening to their concerns
and ideas. Educational
opportunities for citizens and elected officials abound.
I’m constantly amazed at the number of persons who don’t know about
the extensive transportation planning that goes on. And, environmental justice concerns keep transportation
planners grounded in local social issues.
4.
I’m grateful that our MPO is both multi-jurisdictional and
multi-function, serving six local governments’ comprehensive and current
planning needs in addition to transportation planning.
It means, for one thing, that we develop and produce the necessary
building block data – demographic projections, building permit summaries,
economic forecasts. I like not
having to rely on another agency for that information.
It also means that the freshly completed countywide land use and building
condition survey for the 2030 Transportation Plan can be used this fall to
update the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Multi-functionality provides us a seamless planning process from
beginning to end.
5.
Assistance from FHWA and INDOT exceeds my expectations.
The results of requests for advice and help from both agencies have been
timely, useful and productive. Good
ideas from both agencies helped produce a better UPWP.
Some of those ideas will save local tax dollars and free up training
money for non-transportation planning staff.
6.
The MPO Council lives up to its billing as a supportive collection of
colleagues, not only in theory but in practice.
The Council does a good job of leveling the playing field for all MPOs
and sharing information and ideas that benefit citizens all over the state.
So…thanks for welcoming
the new kid on the block - at my age I’ll accept the appellation “kid” any
day.